Ethnic Inequity in Oatmeal

The instant oatmeal packets I use often have “fun facts” printed on one side – I assume they’re for kids, but I read them anyway. Today, however, I saw one that looked particularly odd:

In 1854 there were 700 people living in California. One hundred twenty-five years later, the same area had a population of 21,520,000.

I don’t think I believe the first figure. California was admitted to the Union in 1850. This means there must have been white people of some kind by that time, and not even Spaniards. Add to that the indigenous population, and a figure of 700 makes no sense: California had at least 53 indigenous languages spoken in its area in pre-Columbian times. Say some had become extinct, leaving only 40 languages, each with 20 speakers from roughly three clans per language. That still yields a figure of 800 Native Americans.

I suspect that the figure given by the oatmeal packet did not figure indigenous people into the number of people living in California but counted only the people counted by the census as permanent residents. Come on: we should be past the point where we neglect to consider people of another “colour” human beings just because the census of the time did.

Advertisements

4 responses to “Ethnic Inequity in Oatmeal

  1. Are you sure it’s “here” and not “there”?

    Like

  2. or, maybe oatmeal companies, like statisticians, just make up figures that they think would prove something everyone already knows — in this case the population explosion in california. because it seems like all of the numbers are all random, even the “125 years later”.

    Like

  3. Haha. The cynical view, that there are lies, damned lies and statistics.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s